For Christmas I received a fascinating present from a pal - my really own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (terrific title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and bphomesteading.com it has glowing reviews.

Yet it was totally written by AI, with a couple of easy triggers about me supplied by my friend Janet.

It's an intriguing read, and extremely funny in parts. But it likewise meanders rather a lot, and is somewhere between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty design of writing, however it's likewise a bit recurring, and extremely verbose. It might have surpassed Janet's triggers in collating data about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading technology reporter ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a mystical, repeated hallucination in the kind of my cat (I have no family pets). And there's a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of business online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had actually offered around 150,000 customised books, primarily in the US, given that rotating from putting together AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The firm utilizes its own AI tools to generate them, based upon an open source large language model.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who developed it, can buy any more copies.

There is presently no barrier to anybody producing one in anyone's name, consisting of celebs - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around abusive content. Each book includes a printed disclaimer mentioning that it is fictional, created by AI, and created "entirely to bring humour and delight".

Legally, the copyright comes from the firm, however Mr Mashiach worries that the product is intended as a "customised gag gift", and the books do not get offered further.

He wishes to widen his range, creating various genres such as sci-fi, and maybe providing an autobiography service. It's designed to be a light-hearted kind of customer AI - selling AI-generated goods to human clients.

It's likewise a bit frightening if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least because it most likely took less than a minute to produce, wiki.snooze-hotelsoftware.de and it does, certainly in some parts, sound simply like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have actually expressed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then produce similar material based upon it.

"We ought to be clear, when we are speaking about information here, we actually indicate human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI companies to regard creators' rights.

"This is books, this is posts, this is images. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to learn how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a song featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms because it was not their work and they had not granted it. It didn't stop the track's creator attempting to nominate it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were fake, it was still wildly popular.

"I do not believe the use of generative AI for imaginative functions should be prohibited, however I do think that generative AI for these functions that is trained on people's work without permission need to be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be extremely effective but let's construct it fairly and fairly."

OpenAI states Chinese rivals utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have actually chosen to obstruct AI developers from trawling their online material for training purposes. Others have actually decided to collaborate - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for example.

The UK government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would permit AI designers to use developers' material on the web to help establish their designs, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "insanity".

He points out that AI can make advances in locations like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and messing up the incomes of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is also strongly versus removing copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth developers, 2.4 million jobs and a whole lot of happiness," states the Baroness, who is also an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is undermining among its finest carrying out markets on the vague pledge of development."

A federal government representative stated: "No relocation will be made up until we are definitely confident we have a practical strategy that delivers each of our objectives: increased control for ideal holders to help them certify their material, access to premium product to train leading AI models in the UK, and more transparency for right holders from AI designers."

Under the UK government's new AI plan, a national data library including public data from a broad variety of sources will likewise be offered to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal rules to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to increase the security of AI with, to name a few things, firms in the sector needed to share information of the workings of their systems with the US federal government before they are released.

But this has actually now been rescinded by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, but he is said to desire the AI sector to face less policy.

This comes as a number of lawsuits versus AI firms, and particularly versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been gotten by everyone from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They claim that the AI firms broke the law when they took their content from the web without their approval, and used it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and are therefore exempt. There are a variety of elements which can constitute reasonable use - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it gathers training data and whether it ought to be spending for it.

If this wasn't all sufficient to ponder, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the past week. It became the a lot of downloaded free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it developed its innovation for a portion of the cost of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's existing supremacy of the sector.

As for me and a profession as an author, I think that at the minute, if I really desire a "bestseller" I'll still have to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weak point in generative AI tools for bigger tasks. It has plenty of mistakes and hallucinations, and it can be quite tough to read in parts since it's so verbose.

But given how quickly the tech is developing, I'm not sure the length of time I can remain positive that my considerably slower human writing and modifying skills, are much better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest developments in global innovation, with analysis from BBC correspondents all over the world.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.